How prepared are cities to clean up transport?
Legend
We scored cities across the following five categories:
Space for people
Score based on the lengths of separated pedestrian footways and all cycling paths compared to the total length of the city road network, as well as the average of TomTom traffic congestion index over 3 years
Safe roads
Score based on the number of pedestrian and cyclist fatalities over three years compared to the population of the city
Access to climate-friendly mobility
Score based on the affordability and accessibility of public transport, and access to public and semi-public electric vehicle charging stations
Policies
Score based on whether zero/low emission zones are in place or planned, whether phasing out the sales of polluting cars is planned, and whether bike/car sharing and integrated public transport tickets/apps exist
Clean air
Score based on 3-year annual mean concentrations and the trends of NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 over 5 years, with a stronger focus on traffic stations
| Rank | City | Country | Clean Cities Score |
Overall Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Tweet your mayor |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oslo | Norway | 71.50% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 2 | Amsterdam | Netherlands | 65.50% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 3 | Helsinki | Finland | 64.20% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 4 | Copenhagen | Denmark | 62.30% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 5 | Paris | France | 61.90% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 6 | Stockholm | Sweden | 61.70% | B | Tweet | ||||||
| 7 | Ghent | Belgium | 58.70% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 8 | Munich | Germany | 57.50% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 9 | Brussels | Belgium | 57.00% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 10 | Barcelona | Spain | 56.90% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 11 | Lyon | France | 56.60% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 12 | London | United Kingdom | 55.80% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 13 | Vienna | Austria | 55.50% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 14 | Bilbao | Spain | 55.00% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 15 | Lisbon | Portugal | 53.50% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 16 | Madrid | Spain | 52.80% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 17 | Birmingham | United Kingdom | 52.80% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 18 | Antwerp | Belgium | 52.00% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 19 | Berlin | Germany | 51.60% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 20 | Milan | Italy | 51.10% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 21 | Strasbourg | France | 50.60% | C | Tweet | ||||||
| 22 | Liège | Belgium | 49.70% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 23 | Turin | Italy | 49.30% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 24 | Hamburg | Germany | 48.40% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 25 | Cologne | Germany | 47.00% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 26 | Marseille | France | 46.60% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 27 | Granada | Spain | 46.20% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 28 | Ljubljana | Slovenia | 45.70% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 29 | Prague | Czech Republic | 45.10% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 30 | Manchester | United Kingdom | 42.10% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 31 | Edinburgh | United Kingdom | 41.30% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 32 | Rome | Italy | 40.40% | D | Tweet | ||||||
| 33 | Tri-city | Poland | 39.50% | E | Tweet | ||||||
| 34 | Warsaw | Poland | 38.70% | E | Tweet | ||||||
| 35 | Krakow | Poland | 37.90% | E | Tweet | ||||||
| 36 | Naples | Italy | 37.80% | E | Tweet |
